The Chinese and Asian Art Forum. For Fans, Collectors and Dealers.
Basic Rules For the BidAmount Asian Art Forum: Talk about whatever you want. You can even discuss and offer things that are for sale if they are authentic. Maximum image file size per post is 2 MB. Images of 700pxl x 700pxl are optimal if saved at a medium resolution. Be respectful of others and enjoy yourself. Click the YouTube link for a brief tutorial on using the forum. You can also EMBED Videos by cutting and pasting from You-Tube, Vimeo etc.
Anatomy of a Fake
I recently purchased this "republic" period vase based only on rather poor online photos. Once I received it I immediately knew it was a fake. My wife and I are long-time western porcelain collectors and have recently decided to enter the Chinese arena, and are finding the situation with fakes and reproductions to be mind boggling--especially when it comes to 20th century pieces. I present my novice observations regarding the vase here in the hopes that more experienced collectors will elaborate on/critique my conclusions. The vase was sold through ebth.com. I believe they are basically honest but the expertise of their listers varies wildly.
Earthenware. Evidenced by the vase's heaviness, thick-walled potting, and very diffuse nature of the unglazed part of the foot rim, and of course the definitive lack of light transmission through the body. I have not heard much discussion of porcelain versus earthenware. I know earthenware was a legitimate material on early pieces but don't know how extensively it is seen on true republic pieces.
Molded. Looking into the throat of the piece it appears there are faint turning marks, but there is a very clear mold line seen on the exterior surface. Again, haven't heard much discussion on hand-thrown versus molded and whether molded construction was an acceptable technique during the Republic period.
Grit in enamel. Noticeable grit/roughness seen in the enamels. Level varies, with green and browns being the worst. The unpainted part of the body is fairly smooth, so this indicates to me that it isn't kiln grit but rather contaminants present in the enamels.
Foot Rim Distress. The foot rim shows unnatural scrapping and characteristic fake grime.
Mark. The mark was the most convincing part to me. Even seeing it up close I could not distinguish the mark from legitimate Tonzhi stamp marks which were used in the late 19th and early 20th century.
I guess you’re right with your observations. It’s a modern vase. The most important point to judge is always the painting style. Here we have low painting quality with rather garish colors.
The issue of fake/modern republic period porcelain is overwhelming. There are some extremely high quality Repo's now available and being sold widespread including auction houses and eBay. To name just two.
In order to grasp the difference between the two one must read, view and handle as much as one can in order to determine the difference's etc.
Your vase is modelled on a Qing style 'bailu zun' pattern. However IMO the handles are wrong!
The glaze has IMO the appearance of being a dull white and powdery. Distinctly different appeal from those fired pre 1949. IMO modern kilns can't get it right with modern furnace versus the old coal and pine kilns.
The overall look of your vase is IMO very stiff looking, painted with haste. Childlike appearance. Lacking the fine qualities associated with said/earlier periods.
The colours appear IMO to be wrong also. Too bright. The blue is very watery and has no appeal.
The availably cobalt blue was practically non-existent during the period 1937-1945 due to the Japanese invasion.
There appears to be no wear or tear on your vase. Also a problem IMO.
The mark/seal is probably the easiest part to copy/fake/tribute. One must not rely on same but look at the overall structure of said, including the above points I have quickly outlined.
This is a porcelain vase, not earthenware - but it may just be too thick to transmit light. Porcelain is not an expensive material to work with or make , and I would guess 100% of all modern chinese copies of qing dynasty porcelain are porcelain themselves;
the qualities and make-up of the material is another complex subject entirely - sometimes modern porcelain comes out grey rather than white, and in some eras the material was much denser and finer than others, but the basic composition of ancient yuan dynasty vases and modern fakes has not changed much. So it cannot be used always as a determining factor .
As Shinigami says , the painting style and artistry of a piece is the key , as well as its form ,the elegance, proportions, things like the handles, the shape and length of the neck etc. Modern copiers cannot reproduce /copy /mimic the skills and talent of the original decorators , the shading of the colours in flowers , leaves etc. , the balance of the composition.
On the question of moulding , large vases and jars do have lines where the two halves, usually bottom and top were joined together, and these 'luting lines' can be both prominent on the piece, and important sign of age and genuineness - it means they were thrown on the wheel in separate halves and then joined by hand. Modern moulded vases are usually made in one mould (maybe , not sure?) or possibly two vertical halves, but of course fakers can also try to copy or imitate the luting lines sometimes, so again this is not a sure fire sign of age.
It's been said many times on this forum and by Peter in his videos , the mark is the last thing you should consider , as the least reliable evidence of authenticity.
I suggest before buying anything else you research more and watch Peter's videos, only buy from reputable dealers or items on the Bidamount weekly ebay newsletter pages , and ask here, before you buy, about items you are considering.
Since you said that you are at your beginning in the Chinese ceramic field, I feel like I should suggest a few considerations on the points of the “anatomy” that you made.
Body: be sure that it is porcelain. It is simply not transmitting light through because of the thickness. Earthenware with that transparent glaze does not exist. The brownish skin on the bare foot is due to the impurities in the paste, that burn oxidized in the kiln.
Molded/hand made: what do you mean by molded? It can either means molded by hand or molded in a mold. What do you mean by mold line, is it vertical or horizontal? How big is the vase, which is the diameter of the mouth? After having these answers I should elaborate more, but I suspect that you think that the vase has been molded in a mold and most probably it is not the case.
Grit in enamel: although the enamels actually doesn’t look so good, keep in mind that Chinese enamels are much thicker than those that you are used to see, and it is normal to have rough surfaces, like blistering, more or less depending from the period.
Foot rim: it is absolutely normal to see scrapings on the foot rim, and also grits are not a problem. Foot rims are usually hand finished and the grim belongs from the kiln.
Mark: I strongly suggest you to not consider the mark at all, especially at the beginning. It is the last thing to look at.
Said that, what makes evidence, at first glance, that your vase is a modern one, of low quality? As suggested by Birgit and Mark, the painting style is off and childish. To be in conditions to note this, it is necessary to see a certain number of genuine pieces (just for example, look at the unnatural size of the birds compared to the flowers: are them birds or bees?”. The style is very childish.
Ooops, dear Tam, we did post at the same time, I haven't seen your post when posting mine.
I see that we are saying exactly the same things, and it is clear that my questions about the molding question were meant to arrive at what you have said.
Thanks for everyone's reply. To clarify a couple points, the piece was molded as opposed to hand thrown. By molded I mean the standard two-part mold that is separated once the piece is formed. The mold line represents the separation between the two sections of the mold. The mold has to be done along a line of symmetry which means vertically in this case. My question is: Is the fact that a piece is molded a reliable discriminate between republic-period pieces and later fakes?
This piece is definitely not translucent and therefore not true porcelain. Earthenware may not be the correct term, but there seems to be little attention paid to the various types of bodies in Chinese porcelain. Same question as above. Is the fact that a piece has a non-porcelain body a useful piece of information in determining potential fakes? Were non-porcelain bodies used on porcelain-looking pieces in the republic period?
The enamels contain gritty contaminants. Just to be clear, I am not talking about kiln grit. The grit occurs only in the enameled areas. Most authentic pieces I have seen have fairly smooth enamels with only very minor occurrences of grit. Again, I'm wondering if particularly gritty enamels is a useful piece of information in spotting fakes.
Seems to me the fake market has become so prolific that we need to use all the tools at our disposal. Therefore, it is important to understand as much about the manufacturing techniques as possible-meaning body composition, method of forming, firing techniques, glaze & enamel composition, etc. These things can be objectively determined, but I've seen little discussion on the topics except for archeological studies of early pieces. Subjective techniques such as painting technique/quality will always be an important part of authentication, but I would not underestimate the adversary, and have no doubt that (when the price is right) there are plenty of talented Chinese artists that are perfectly capable of emulating the historic styles well enough to fool my eye.
Hello (don’t know your name), I can only reiterate all the suggestions that I gave above. It is up to you to consider them or not. Since you said that you are new to the world of Chinese ceramics, I expect that one should hear from the more experienced, but if not, no problem.
The vase is porcelain, there is not the slightest doubt about that.
I do not see a vertical joining line inside the vase. It could be slip cast, a technique that begun in the early 20th C ., but I will be surprised if this vase is slip cast. You have not said the diameter of the mouth, but I tend to think that it is hand made. Can you take a picture of the inside?
Nobody said that the enamels could have been contaminated in the kiln. I said that it is normal to have rough enamels, impurities, blistering, and so on.
Sorry but, as general rule, it is not the nature of enamels, body, etc etc that spots the fake. And it is not the painting style that it is easy to copy. It is exactly all the opposite. Enamels can be reproduced while the “hand” of the painter is the hardest point to replicate.
Anyway, I do not see why calling this vase as fake. Fake of what? It is simply a very clearly modern vase to me.
I agree with Giovanni. To judge the age of an item you don't have to be a technical expert. You just have to look at many many real items then you can often see at a glance if something is old or not. The more items you have seen the easier you can jugde them. There are people here who are really good at it and others like me who still learn, but I guess none of us pays great attention to the technical details.
Hello (I also don't know your name) -
Re your comments on 'understanding of manufacturing techniques used'. Aspects such as body clay, glaze, cobalt and enamel compositions and formations, motifs and compositions, and the writing of marks, as well as the different construction, trimming, finishing and firing techniques used in different periods, and even how the potters adjusted/change such within these periods ie: Song, Ming, Qing, have all been study in great depth and the findings published extensively throughout the last 20 years or so.
All the above is, of course, of great interest to those who wish to know and understand the differences regarding these subjects - but has also, rather unfortunately, been of great help to/for the copyist and fakers. However whilst all the above may, at some point, help to determine whether any piece is, ultimately, authentic or not in the first instance is immaterial ...
It is the 'eye' that informs first and foremost - this is done by recognising the original hand/style from a certain reign/period, or an attempt to replicate this in a latter copy, which is the critical point ... This is also true with monochromes - a somewhat specialist area within itself ...
Although some people have a 'natural eye', such instant 'recognition' only comes with looking at, handling, studying and discussing genuine pieces with others over a long time ...
Thanks for visiting "The BidAmount Asian Art Forum | Chinese Art"
If you sell on eBay, or have a shop feel free to post images and descriptions and links.
Check back often for discussion about the latest news in the Chinese art and antique world. Also find out about the latest Asian art auctions at Sotheby's, Christie's, Bonhams and Tajans.
Auction results for: fine porcelain, ceramics, bronze, jade, textiles and scholar's objects. As well as Japanese, Thai, Vietnamese and other Asian cultures.
Topics and categories on The BidAmount Asian Art Forum | Chinese Art
Kangxi vases, Kangxi dishes and chargers, Kangxi ritual pieces, Kangxi scholar's objects, Qianlong famille rose, Qianlong enamels, Qianlong period paintings, Qianlong Emporer's court, Fine porcelain of the Yongzheng period. Chinese imperial art, Ming porcelain including Jiajing, Wanli, Xuande, Chenghua as well as Ming jades and bronzes.
The BidAmount Asian Art Forum | Chinese Art
A free Asian art discussion board and Asian art message board for dealers and collectors of art and antiques from China, Japan, Korea, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam and the rest of Asia. Linked to all of the BidAmount Asian art reference areas, with videos from plcombs Asian Art and Bidamount on YouTube. Sign up also for the weekly BidAmount newsletter and catalogs of active eBay listing of Chinese porcelain, bronze, jades, robes, and paintings.
The art of calligraphy - and for the ancient Chinese it certainly was an art - aimed to demonstrate superior control and skill using brush and ink. Calligraphy established itself as one of the major Chinese art forms during the Han dynasty (206 BCE - 220 CE), and for two millennia after, all educated men were expected to be proficient at it.
The Museum’s collections of Asian art span nearly five millennia and encompass the cultures of China, the Himalayas, India, Japan, Korea, and Southeast Asia. In 2007, the Museum launched an initiative to create dedicated galleries for the collection, beginning with a gallery for the arts of Korea ...
Chinese art is full of symbolism, in that artists typically seek to depict some aspect of a totality of which they are intuitively aware.
China Online Museum is the finest online museum of Chinese art. It features Chinese calligraphy, painting, ceramics, bronzes, carving, and other artworks.
Chinese Ceramics & Works of Art. Overview Upcoming auctions Contacts Auction results ... Christie’s sales of Chinese ceramics and works of art showcase centuries of Chinese history. Held throughout the year in London, New York, Paris and Hong Kong, they attract a wide audience of collectors and connoisseurs vying for pieces as diverse as ...
Explore Asian Art Week. Contact the Specialist Department. Chinese Paintings ... Senior Specialist, Head of Sale. email@example.com. Tel:+1 212 641 5760. Bid in-person or online for the upcoming auction:Fine Chinese Paintings on 10 September 2019 at New York. Bid in-person or online for the upcoming auction:Fine Chinese Paintings on 10 ...
Discover an abundance of must-see art from all corners of a vast continent at Christie’s NY Asian Art Week. From contemporary classical and Chinese paintings to works with exemplary provenance from the Art Institute of Chicago, our Rockefeller Paza galleries will be full of ancient treasures and contemporary masterworks in a salute to the vibrant arts of Asia.
Sold to benefit The Art Institute of Chicago’s Asian Art Acquisition Fund, the sale features 84 lots with a focus on Ming and Qing porcelains, and offers a rare insight into the taste for collecting Chinese ceramics and works of art in the Midwest from the end of the 19th century through the 1980s. Highlights include two Wanli wucai garlic-head vases, a Qianlong mark and period, blue and ...
Specialist, Chinese Paintings, Christie's London Dr Malcolm McNeill is a Specialist in Chinese Paintings at Christie’s, based in London. He previously worked as an assistant curator of the Chinese collections and the Victoria and Albert Museum in London, as a researcher at the British Museum, and as a translator and tour guide at the National Palace Museum in Taipei.
The Christie's Education 2020 Conference: The Chinese Art Market 18 Jun 2019 Christie’s Education is delighted to announce our first international academic conference in Asia which will take place in Hong Kong from 26-27 November 2020 at the Hong Kong Convention and Exhibition Centre and will run in parallel with Christie’s Hong Kong Autumn Auctions.
The summer Chinese Art sale in Hong Kong will feature works of art from several private collections, including Qing porcelains and textile from the collection of the legendary Chinese art dealer A. W. Bahr (1877–1959), fine gilt bronze Buddhist sculptures from an old Hong Kong collection, an East Asian collection of Qing dynasty wine cups and jades, and a Japanese collection of Song ceramics ...
Sotheby's Chinese Works of Art Department holds two auctions each year in London, New York, Hong Kong and Paris.
Chinese Art - View Auction details, bid, buy and collect the various artworks at Sothebys Art Auction House.
With more than 340 Chinese works of art dating from the Neolithic to the Republic periods, highlights of this sale include a selection of Qing Imperial monochromes from the collection of Arnold and Blema Steinberg, early ceramics from the Art Institute of Chicago and Chinese porcelain and works of art from the collection of Henry Arnhold.
Results: Sotheby's Asia Week achieved $52.4 million in six strong auctions, exceeding pre-sale estimates. With 76.5% of lots sold and 60.3% of lots surpassing high estimates, the Asian art sales at Sotheby's indicate continued collector interest in the finest works of art from China, India and and the Himalayas.
Today's sale of Important Chinese Art will proceed as planned with sessions at 10 AM and 2 PM EDT. Sotheby's will be monitoring the weather conditions throughout the day and will be available to coordinate alternative bidding options should conditions make it difficult for clients to attend the auction in person.
Bonhams Chinese Art department is renowned for offering the finest works of art representing the richness and breadth of China's artistic heritage, particularly Imperial porcelain, white and spinach green jades, cloisonné and Buddhist art. Specialised international auctions are held globally, including London, Hong Kong and San Francisco.
Bonhams are international auctioneers of fine Chinese and Japanese art. We specialise in rare Imperial and Export Chinese ceramics and works of art, as well as Japanese ceramics, fine and decorative works of art from the Neolithic Period to the 20th century. View on map